Call: 0800 321 3832 Request a free callback

Family Law Blog

Comment on divorce & family law

Divorce: litigation or mediation, which is best for you?

By , on Thursday April 10, 2025 at 1:28 pm

When a marriage comes to an end, one of the biggest decisions you’ll face is how to proceed with the separation. Separating couples are expected to explore mediation or other non-court dispute resolution methods before initiating court proceedings. Even if litigation becomes necessary, it is still encouraged to seek agreement throughout the process. Mediation is often a more amicable and cost-effective option, but court intervention may be required in certain situations. Each route has its benefits and drawbacks, and choosing the right path depends on your unique circumstances. As family law specialists at Woolley & Co, we help individuals understand the best option for them.

Understanding divorce: the difference between litigation and mediation

In the first instance, it’s crucial to understand what litigation and mediation are and what each process involves.

What is litigation?

Litigation involves making an application and using the court process to reach financial or children arrangements on divorce. You do not have to have a lawyer to represent you although most people find it very helpful. Even when using litigation, parties are expected to negotiate and reach an agreement where possible.

If an agreement cannot be reached, the courts will then decide on asset division, maintenance, and child arrangements.

What is mediation?

Mediation is a process where a neutral third party (a mediator) helps separating couples reach an agreement on key aspects such as finances, property, and children. Unlike court proceedings, mediation is non-adversarial and focuses on collaboration rather than conflict. Mediation does not replace divorce; it helps facilitate agreements to make the legal process smoother and more cost effective. Seeking legal advice can also play a crucial role in ensuring a successful mediation.

The pros and cons of divorce litigation

The pros

Legally binding outcomes
One of the biggest advantages of going through the courts is that the outcome is legally enforceable. When a judge issues a financial settlement or child arrangements order, both parties must comply. This provides certainty and prevents one party from later reneging on an agreement, which can be a risk with informal negotiations.

Fair resolution in complex cases
For couples with complicated finances – such as business ownership, international assets, pensions, or high-value properties – litigation ensures that every aspect is thoroughly examined. The court will consider legal precedents, financial disclosure, and expert assessments to reach a just division of assets. This is particularly important when one spouse may have significantly more financial knowledge or control than the other.

Protection in high-conflict situations
Litigation is often necessary when there are high levels of conflict, domestic abuse, or significant power imbalances. If one party is manipulative, controlling, or unwilling to negotiate fairly, mediation may not be effective. In these cases, a judge’s intervention ensures that decisions are made objectively and with legal safeguards in place.

The cons

Time-consuming
Court cases can drag on for months or even years, especially if there are disputes over finances, property, or children. The timeline is influenced by court availability, legal complexities, and the willingness of both parties to cooperate. This prolonged process can make it difficult for individuals to move on with their lives.

Expensive
Legal fees in litigation can add up quickly. Court costs, solicitor fees, and potential expert witness expenses can make it one of the most expensive ways to divorce. If proceedings are prolonged due to disagreements, costs can escalate even further. For some, this financial burden makes litigation less attractive than alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation.

Emotionally draining
Divorce is already a difficult experience, but litigation can heighten stress, resentment, and emotional exhaustion. Court proceedings are adversarial by nature, often increasing hostility between ex-partners. This can be particularly damaging if children are involved, as ongoing conflict between parents can negatively impact their well-being.

The pros and cons of mediation

The pros

Cost-effective
One of the most significant advantages of mediation is its affordability. Court proceedings can be expensive, with legal fees, court costs, and barrister fees adding up quickly – especially if litigation is prolonged due to disputes. Mediation, on the other hand, typically involves fewer sessions with a mediator, making it a more budget-friendly alternative. Even if you choose to seek legal advice alongside mediation, the overall cost is often considerably lower than taking your case to court.

Faster resolution
Mediation generally leads to quicker resolutions compared to litigation. Court cases can take months or even years to conclude due to backlogs in the family court system, legal complexities, and disputes. In contrast, mediation sessions can be scheduled quickly, and many couples reach agreements within a few weeks or months. This allows both parties to move on with their lives much sooner.

Less stressful
Unlike litigation, which is inherently adversarial, mediation focuses on collaboration and constructive discussions. This can significantly reduce stress and tension between separating partners. Instead of battling in a courtroom, mediation encourages open communication in a neutral setting, helping to preserve a more amicable relationship – something particularly beneficial when children are involved.

Better for co-parenting
For couples with children, mediation can be particularly beneficial. Rather than engaging in a combative legal process, mediation fosters cooperative decision-making, which can set the stage for a healthier co-parenting dynamic. Agreements reached through mediation often prioritise the best interests of the children, helping to create stable and practical arrangements for their care. Additionally, children benefit when parents can communicate effectively without ongoing conflict.

The cons

Not legally binding
One of the main drawbacks of mediation is that agreements reached are not automatically legally enforceable. While mediation can lead to mutually acceptable solutions, these agreements must be formalised into a consent order (approved by a court) to ensure they are legally binding. Without this step, there is a risk that one party may later refuse to adhere to the agreed terms, requiring further legal action.

Not suitable for all situations
Mediation relies on both parties being willing to negotiate in good faith. If one spouse is unwilling to communicate, conceals financial assets, or refuses to compromise, mediation may not be effective. Additionally, in cases involving domestic abuse, coercion, or significant power imbalances, mediation may not provide the necessary legal protections. In such situations, seeking legal representation and court intervention is often a better approach to ensure fairness and safety.

Divorce: litigation vs mediation, which should you choose?

Your choice between litigation and mediation will depend on several factors, including:

  • Your ability to communicate with your spouse: If you and your spouse can discuss matters (even if you need some help to do so) mediation is worth considering.
  • Complexity of assets and finances: If you have complex financial arrangements or business interests, divorce litigation may be necessary.
  • Children’s welfare: Mediation can help parents create a child-focused agreement with minimal conflict.
  • Legal protection needs: If there are concerns about domestic abuse or power imbalances, court proceedings provide more protection.

How Woolley & Co can help

At Woolley & Co, Solicitors, we understand that every separation is unique. Our expert family law solicitors can guide you through the process, whether you choose mediation or traditional divorce proceedings. We offer:

  • Expert legal advice tailored to your situation.
  • Court representation if litigation is necessary.
  • A compassionate approach to minimise stress and conflict.

Choosing between divorce litigation and mediation is a significant decision, but you don’t have to face it alone. Our experienced solicitors at Woolley & Co are here to help. Get in touch today for a confidential consultation and take the first step towards a resolution that works for you.

Call us on 0800 321 3832 or complete our online form to take advantage of a free 30-minute consultation with an expert local divorce and family law solicitor.

Davina Warrington
Family law solicitor, Burton on Trent

Blog Author - Davina Warrington

Davina WarringtonDavina Warrington

Woolley & Co's Burton upon Trent-based family solicitor Davina, specialises in divorce, financial settlements and family law.

Profile

Get Advice